luda 曼奇尼执教的意大利队，凭借流畅的进攻，在2020年欧洲杯上取得成功，从而改变了大家对意大利足球固有的认识。
防守足球被认为是意大利足球的固有属性，但是曼奇尼的意大利队，用他们更具进取的方式，改变了这一点。
当人们指责索斯盖特的球队，后卫防守太过强硬时，被认为是学习法国的打法了。2018年世界杯冠军显然是英格兰主帅的学习的对象，这是可以理解的。
索斯盖特在执教方面，一直在学习。他是一个实用主义者，他观察到了什么是有效的，那么他就会去学习。德尚因为在俄罗斯世界杯，被一些人指责太保守。但当拿到了冠军后，却再没人吭声了。索斯盖特显然学习到了这一点。
这显然是一段时间以来，国际足球的经验和教训。在2010年世界杯决赛中夺冠的六名西班牙球员中，有五名在第二年代表巴塞罗那对阵曼联的欧冠决赛中首发出场，并帮助巴萨夺冠。
西班牙国家队唯一不同的是，博斯克没有梅西，他只有老老实实将阿隆索放在后卫的前面，加强防守。四场淘汰赛都以同样的1:0的比分获胜。虽然场面不怎么华丽，但是一切都在博斯克的掌握之中。
胜利者书写的不仅仅是历史，还有未来。也许球迷们现在应该为意大利欢呼了。曼奇尼已经展示，意大利还可以有一个更开放的比赛方式，去赢得比赛。这是人们没见过的另外一种方式。
意大利是和英格兰在2020年欧洲杯小组赛中三场比赛都没有失球的球队之一。但这并不意味着意大利很保守。他们进球很多，经常通过大比分击败对手晋级。
曼奇尼在蓝衣军团的职业生涯并不尽如人意，在1990年的世界杯板凳上度过了比赛，因为当时的主帅显然更愿意派防守球员上场。
意大利队现在已经连续11胜，已打进32次，没有丢一球。在16强对奥地利的比赛后，球队不败已经延长到30场。
可能有人认为，是大家对意大利的期望值低，减少了压力。意大利队甚至没有获得2018年世界杯的参赛资格，自15年前赢得世界杯后，也没有进入过淘汰赛阶段。在经历多次失败后，意大利队给人感觉已经是弱队，改变了以往大家将目光放在他们身上情况，从历史的重压中解脱出来，变成了现在一支崭新的球队。
曼努埃尔·洛卡特利和多梅尼科·贝拉迪的萨苏奥洛组合让球队显得更加积极。莱昂纳多·斯皮纳佐拉被赋予左后卫抢夺球权的任务，他的积极跑动一直是球队占据场上主动权的依靠。
这位28岁的罗马球员之所以能成为一名高效球员，既要归功于球队体系，也要归功于球员的个人天赋。这反映了曼奇尼的工作，在中场的轮换，进攻设计复杂和比赛转换明显。
现在的意大利队，对那些坚持认为意大利打法保守的人，是一记漂亮的反击。还有一种可能性：它反映了那些人的局限性。
比较一下。曼奇尼第二次执教国际米兰前后，曾在加拉塔萨雷和圣彼得堡泽尼特当过主教练，虽然看起来他的执教之路开始走下坡路。但他在各大联赛中的夺冠次数仍然超过了2020年欧洲杯其他23名教练的总和。
曼奇尼粗暴的性格，使他被普遍认为不适合这份主教练工作。但意大利找到了一个在球场内外都有自己风格的教练。
他的成功能改变人们的想法吗？这将取决于接下来会发生什么。意大利可能只是短暂的辉煌。欧洲杯历史上这样的例子很多：一支球队在一个阶段表现非常亮眼，但时间短暂，他们的辉煌就如昙花一现。意大利也会这样吗？
在2008年欧洲杯上，荷兰是一支出色的球队，直到他们在四分之一决赛，意外地被俄罗斯击败。四年前，俄罗斯队以4:1大胜捷克队，赢得了人们的赞叹，但他们最终小组都没出线。
如果意大利被奥地利爆冷，或者被葡萄牙击败，一切都将恢复人们原有的认知。但如果他们能完成15场比赛的胜利，人们固有的认知将会受到挑战。索斯盖特和他的同行们，又将有一个新的模板可以学习。
原文：
Roberto Mancini’s Italy could transform international football by succeeding at Euro 2020 with an attacking game
Defensive football is seen as winning football in the international game but Roberto Mancini’s Italy could change that with their more enterprising approach
When it was put to Gareth Southgate that his full-backs were playing too defensively, it was revealing that he soon reached for the example of France. The 2018 World Cup winners are clearly the template for the England manager and understandably so.
Southgate is a student of the game, more pragmatist than philosopher, and he has observed what works. Didier Deschamps was criticised for going with Benjamin Pavard and Lucas Hernandez in Russia but nobody on the Champs-Elysees was bothered after the final.
This has been the lesson of international football for some time. Spain's front six that won the 2010 World Cup final included five of the same players who would start the Champions League final for Barcelona against Manchester United the following year.
The one difference was that with Vicente Del Bosque unable to call upon Lionel Messi, he sat Xabi Alonso in front of the defence instead. All four knockout games were won by the same 1-0 scoreline. Often sterile but always in control.
It is not just history that is written by the winners but the future too. With that in mind, perhaps fans of the international game should be cheering on Italy now. Roberto Mancini has shown that the possibility of a more expansive approach remains. There is another way.
Italy are the only team at Euro 2020 to win all three of their group games without conceding a goal but it has been anything but conservative. They boast the best goal difference, have had the most shots and have attempted the most through-balls at the tournament.
Mancini was an unfulfilled playing career with the Azzurri, never making it off the bench at that World Cup in 1990. He is making up for it now .
It is 11 wins in a row for Italy now, in which they have scored 32 times without reply. The sequence of games without a defeat has been extended to 30 going into their last-16 game against Austria.
He has been helped by a lowering of expectations. Italy did not even qualify for the World Cup in 2018 and have not reached the knockout stages since winning it 15 years ago. Freed somewhat by the weight of history, the time was right to embrace a new team.
In doing so, a familiar swagger has returned, a sense of optimism embodied by the Sassuolo duo of Manuel Locatelli and Domenico Berardi. The enthusiastic running of Leonardo Spinazzola, entrusted with a marauding role from left-back, has been a feature.
That the 28-year-old Roma man has emerged as a star owes as much to the system as the individual gifts of the player. It reflects Mancini's work, something that is also evident in the rotations in midfield, the sophisticated movements in attack and the switches of play.
Italy's football is making a nonsense of the suggestion that the paucity of ambition shown by others is a necessity due to the lack of time that international coaches have to work with their players. There is another possibility: that it reflects the limitations of those coaches.
Compare the credentials. Mancini's stock may have declined following stints at Galatasaray and Zenit Saint Petersburg either side of his second spell with Inter. But he has still won more titles in major leagues than the other 23 coaches at Euro 2020 put together.
Mancini's abrasive nature might have made him ill-suited for a job that is widely seen to require a more sanguine approach. But the word is that he has mellowed and the result is that Italy find themselves with a coach who has brought style on the pitch and off it.
Could his success change the thinking? That will depend on what happens next. Italy could yet become another statistic. The history of this tournament is littered with examples of teams who burned brightly but briefly, their legacy extinguished in the process.
At Euro 2008, the Netherlands were the outstanding team until they were surprisingly beaten by Russia in the quarter-finals. Four years on and Russia captured the imagination with an emphatic 4-1 win over the Czech Republic but did not even make it out of the group.
If Italy are stifled by Austria or picked off by Portugal, knowing glances will be exchanged, the status quo preserved. But if they can extend that winning run to 15 games, the accepted wisdom will be challenged. Southgate and his ilk will have a new template to copy.